Skip to main content

spam of the week :: laffy gaddafi

Dear Partner,

I am James Francis “born in 1936  Florida  US  undercover business partner with Libyan Leader Muammar Gaddafi, before his dead on 2011 we have an Private account in Asia $20.000,000 usd (Twenty Million US Dollars)  for investment without any beneficiary or identification of the principle, because of my health condition  and security in my country I can't transfer  this fund to my personal account rather i want you to assist me to receive this fund" because the bank have informed me to provide beneficiary immediately .
If you can assist  me in this transaction" by receiving this funds as beneficiary  i will compensate you with 30% of the total amount and you will also get benefit from the investment.

More details will be send to you when I receive your interest response.

Thanks and best regards
James Francis
P/H: +17326595513
Email:jamesfrancis616@rocketmail.com


dear james,

how thoughtful of you to write me. i feel as if we know each other already, what with you calling me 'partner' and all. have you spent time in texas? i think you'd fit in. they like people with lots of money there and they're not particular about how it's earned.

i am sorry to hear that you have a "health condition". i too have a health condition, but it's "good". if your health condition is "not good", i'd suggest you settle somewhere other than the united states. people who are not in good health don't fare so well there, unless they're rich.

by the way, does your health condition affect your vision? i ask, because you say that your account is worth twenty million u.s. dollars, but on closer inspection, it reads "20.000,000". i realise that sometimes banks and currency experts use more than the standard two decimal points in order to be exact, but it's always the placement of the decimal proximate to the first digit that is important. your account is actually worth $20.

i know that in some countries, $20usd is still a significant sum, but since you indicate that there is some risk to you in moving the money, it's possible that it may be safer for you to leave it where it is. i have no doubt that an experienced businessman such as yourself would be able to raise another $20 somehow.

however, if you are determined to get your money back, i have a better proposal to make: on this blog page, there is a button where you can make a donation. i suggest you transfer the money via this means, through paypal. after all, if you do have $20 million and sent it to my bank account, you would have no guarantee that i would transfer your seventy percent once i'd received it. this way, if you don't receive my transfer, you would be able to file a paypal grievance against me. although i appreciate the trust you show me, i think that this is a better solution, in order to avoid the appearance of any impropriety. i'll await notification of your transfer.

thank you for writing to me "partner", i look forward to doing this business together.

yours in utmost sincerity.

p.s. :: i'm surprised that your bank is questioning your principles. surely that's none of their business?

p.p.s. :: given news reports of gaddafi's vast wealth, i'm afraid that he might have been screwing you a bit on your business dealings if you ended up with $20. what business were you in, exactly? just curious.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…