Skip to main content

making faces :: my grown-up face, let me show you it

appearances do count in a tough job market
as i've mentioned, i started a new job, which means i've had to adapt many of my routines once again to the office. that includes coming up with understated, office-friendly faces to wear although, as dom pointed out, i've not received any indication that i need to be exceptionally conscious about myself in this particular office, i do generally like to keep a low-ish profile, at least for a  while. like until they're legally obliged to keep me. until that time, i'm looking to keep things reasonably subtle and trying to pretend i'm smarter than i really am.

it also helps that it's grown very warm and often humid here, so i've been inclined to use a light hand anyway.

so i thought i'd share an example of something i did this week that's a little more reserved, a little more typical of my daytime faces lately. ironically, this particular look makes use of an older mac eye shadow palette that came out with a fall collection, but its combination of neutrals with a little pop of colour [blended, in this case, to give more of a sheen].

i also made use of one of mac's limited edition lipsticks [yeah, all the stuff i'm wearing is basically discontinued- sorry about that] that i felt slipped through the cracks. with mac's limited edition products, i find that amidst the frenzy for bright shades, or supposedly universal [they never are] neutrals, or corals, which always seem to move like cars on the autobahn, there are some real gems that get overlooked, especially some brown-toned lipsticks.

i put that down to the fact that many of us who survived the nineties remember the horror of the brown lipstick trend, where walking around looking like you'd used the contents of your garden or worse was a thing.

i blame her
but the fact is that brown lipstick can be really wearable, surprisingly flattering and not dated or dirty looking. particularly, mac has a talent for creating really pretty brown lipsticks, like "sinister", which came out with their much-touted "venomous villains" collection and was promptly eclipsed by its non-brown cousins. too bad, because it's a really lovely soft brown with a pink-magenta shimmer that adds a little bit of life to it and that keeps it from having that "deadened" look that heavier brown shades can have.



what's a little frustrating is that mac tends to only release these shades in limited edition. i personally find their permanent collection of browns kind of terrifying. on the plus side, since they often don't get much love, these shades have a tendency to turn up at a lot of cosmetic wholesale websites and stores. so, to use an expression that sounds like it should be used only in horror movies, keep your eyes peeled.

here's my take on this... fyi, first two photos are taken in natural light, second two with flash. i'm still playing around with "the big camera" to get everything figured out, but i am getting used to it and growing to appreciate the advantages of its bigness.

the base ::

marcelle beauty balm "light/ medium"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"
marcelle pressed powder "translucent"
smashbox high definition liquid concealer "fair/ light"

the colours ::

eyes ::
mac e/s "next to nothing"* [soft highlight]
mac e/s "tempting" [light bronzy brown]
mac e/s "sharp"* [bright chartreuse]
mac e/s "dark edge"* [satin black-brown]
guerlain kohl "black"
armani eyes to kill mascara

cheeks ::
mac mineralize skinfinish "stereo rose"* [warm coral with amber and terracotta shimmer]

lips ::
mac l/s "sinister"* [soft medium brown with pink/ magenta shimmer]

*suggested alternates :: before leaping into alternates for the shadows, i should point out that the "tempting" eye shadow quad [cult of cherry, 2008] shows up frequently on ebay at very reasonable prices from reputable sellers. but you could also try... next to nothing = nars edie; sharp = mac bitter; dark edge = mac brun or nars mekong [which has gold shimmer, but is almost the only dark brown you need]; stereo rose = nars luster [passable, not great dupe- warmer with more orange and less pink tones]; sinister = nars tanganyka

if you want to see how this same eye shadow quad could be used more dramatically, you can check out another look i did with it here.

and just to show that i am still very much me, i made sure that i donned a nice, bright coral-red lipstick to go out on saturday. i can only act and dress like an adult for so long.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …