Skip to main content

my government is crazier than your government

what you do is your business, unless it's the federal budget
i don't often talk about the canadian government, because i like to live my life in a fantasy world where one out of every three people around me didn't vote for stephen harper or his ronald reagan meets grover norquist ideology. maintaining that fantasy is one of the few things that allows me to leave the house and interact with others on a regular basis.

but sometimes i read the news in spite of myself and that's when i come across things like this.

i believe immigration is a complex issue without any immediately obvious, easy solutions; mostly because it's not one issue, but a whole lot of issues given one general label. and all of those little issues are things that deserve attention. but this latest conservative legislative flourish just reeks of the logic of the bong. i'm sure it was both profound and yet simple in your brain, jason kenney, but once you float it for others to admire, it just sounds like you're really, really high.

to be clear: there is a problem with the backlog of the immigration department. asking people who have moved from locations around the world, often uprooting their families, to wait ten years for a yes or no on their application is unreasonable. so no one's arguing that the government shouldn't try to fix the system.

but deciding that the only possible fix is to randomly dump the applications of those who have been waiting the longest seems, well... nuts.

these are not people who snuck into the country [which is a whole other issue] or who have done anything nefarious while they were here. these are people who were encouraged to come to canada because their skills were needed in our economy and who have been jumping through the procedural hoops for four years or more. they've spent money, paid taxes, contributed to society and waited patiently for the country that said they wanted them to tell them that they can stay.

think of how annoyed you get with the length of the lineup when you go to have your driver's license renewed. now take a moment to appreciate the patience it would take to have your entire life be like that line. and when you get to the wicket, you're told that you can't get your license because you were in line too long.

now, those who are having their cases dropped can reapply under the new regulations, which were tightened when the government realised they were getting more applications than they could handle. because up until that point, no one in government had ever thought about what might happen if more people applied to immigrate than the country was willing to accommodate. oops.

screw you guys, you're goin home!
adding insult to injury, minister kenney's defence of just tossing the older applications is that the skills that those people possess might not be as useful to canada as they were when we first dropped flirtatious hints that these people should come here. he says this like that's life and there's nothing he can do about it. sir, i realise that you may actually be too stoned to comprehend this right now, but you need to understand you're the only person who can do something about it. 


the government has offered to refund some of the money that's been spent by these people on immigration-related costs. it's precious the way that they offer this as if it's doing a favour. it's like if the restaurant forgot to bring your appetizer and the waiter tells you that, just to make things right, they're willing to let you get away with not paying for it. except that immigrating to another country constitutes a pretty big appetizer.

what i find most shocking about this is not that it's drawn criticism, which is to be expected, or that it's likely to pass, because our parliamentary system basically hands absolute power to a majority government in four year increments, but that people are debating this as if it's a serious piece of legislation at all. it isn't. it's insanity. it's an epic "fuck you" from a party that's basically adopted "fuck you" as its official motto and that needs to be pointed out forthwith.

because getting in power and using your majority of house seats to push through whatever you feel like [turnip pie is going to be obligatory on thursdays starting in october] should not free you from the shackles of logic. i, for one, do not want the country turned into a living tribute to terry gilliam's "brazil". and even if the conservatives can force their will, they should not be able to force us to take them seriously when they say things like "the best way to deal with a long line is to get the people at the front of the line to leave- that way no one ends up waiting that long, man!" because that's just stupid and to treat it as anything else is lowering ourselves.

damn, i was so happy in my little fantasy bubble.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…