Skip to main content

making faces :: smoky-eyed saturday

to be fair, if you've been following my adventures in hair, you'll be able to tell from the photos that this look is not from today, but from a little while ago. you'd be surprised how carefully i log what i wear so that i can resurrect it on the blog if the urge strikes me and so that i can monitor if there are any things that aren't getting much love, so that i can decide what to cull. and it is absolutely not because i show signs of ocd, no matter what dom says.

i did an extensive post on smoky-eyed looks last year, but i thought i resurrect the subject, since it is both one of my favourite looks and because it's something that i firmly believe anyone can master. after all, the whole point of the look is that it should be smudgy and inexact, which is perfect if you have no idea what the hell you're doing. or if you're clumsy. hint: both of these descriptors apply to me.

this falls into the category of a more dramatic, evening-out type look. [in fact, this is what i had on at the last caustic lounge.] that said, it's a pretty quick thing to do when you're more interested in doing other things- like getting your cd's together and thinking of what you're going to play- or when you just want something to put on in a hurry that doesn't look like it was done in a hurry.

one of my favourite products to use for this sort of look is mac's loose pigments. these might be my favourite thing that mac produces, since the colours have incredible depth- much more so than most regular eye shadows- and because, while they might cost $24cad, chances are they'll bury you with them, because you need very little.




the downside of loose powders is that they can get a little getting used to, because they can make a mess and it does take some skill to apply them precisely. of course, one of the cool things about loose pigments is that you can apply them wet, which makes it a lot easier to get them where you want them. all you have to keep in mind is that the wetter the brush you use to apply them [although it might be tempting in a preschooler with paints kind of way, i really don't recommend fingers for this], the more pigment you're going to pick up and the more intense the result is going to be.

mac sells a fantastic substance called fix+ that is perfect for spritzing on brushes and applying loose product, or a water-based mixing medium which will make them cling to you like a piece of toilet paper to your heel, but honestly, water works almost as well. i usually just dampen the brush and pat colour on roughly where i need it- it doesn't have to be perfect, just more or less even so that you don't look inebriated or crazy.

once that's done, it's just a matter of taking a blending brush and gently smudging the colours so that they run smoothly together, and making them soft around the edges. blending shadows allows them to mix, but remember that it will also remove some product, so don't press too hard, or you'll end up having to reapply and you'll probably have bits of pigment all over your face. not a good look for anybody.

there are makeup artists who are far more skilled than i who doubtless have special techniques for making these things look perfect, but i generally go for uncomplicated. i don't possess the patience and dexterity needed to get everything just so, because honestly, i don't think anyone's looking at me that intently. and if they are, i'm probably too occupied being creeped out by them to worry what they think of my eye makeup.

here's the end result!

products used

face ::
marcelle new age foundation "ivory"
smashbox high definition liquid concealer "fair/ light"

eyes ::
mac pigment "the family crest"* [warm black with gold/ bronze shimmer]
mac pigment "deep purple" [dark shimmery aubergine]
mac pigment "mauvement"* [frosted light tan]
armani eyes to kill e/s "19"* [shimmery platinum]
inglot e/s "351" [matte ivory]
mac eye kohl "smolder" [black]
chanel inimitable intense mascara

cheeks ::
edward bess quad royale "south of france" [mauve- sand]
mac beauty powder "oh so fair"* [soft light pink]

lips ::
armani l/g "greige d'armani"* [sheer grey-taupe]

*suggested alternates :: the family crest = mac dark soul pigment; mauvement = mac tan pigment or mac e/s "sweet satisfaction"; armani 19 is limited but still available; oh so fair = benefit hervana; greige d'armani is still available and i truly can't think of a dupe for it- it's quite a unique colour. it looks a unwearable in the tube [or as dom put it: "it looks like santorum- and you're putting it on your lips!"], but the relative sheerness makes it very user friendly.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …