Skip to main content

making faces :: i'm a proud exhibitionist

hourglass visionaire eye shadow duo "exhibition"
after my initial hourglass experience, it was pretty much a given that i'd be going back to sample more of their wares. while their product line is lean- rouge bunny rouge and le metier de beaute, two brands i see as occupying a similar "face space" are considerably larger- the quality makes it worth grabbing pretty much anything that catches your fancy. and i must say that i like the fact that they've so far focused on adding to their core offering, rather than teasing the public with things that are available only fleetingly and snatched up by mean folks who live closer to a counter than i do.

one beauty that i always knew i was going to pick up was the "exhibition" eye shadow duo. after all, i loved the rich, smoky tones of "prism" and i am bananas for purple, so it is actually a statistical impossibility that this wouldn't find a happy home with me. and although i held off for a while, thinking that i already had many, many purples, i eventually realised that i was being foolish by trying to resist for the sake of resistance. i've never been a believer in the whole "martyr" theory that self-denial makes you a better person. i'm a perfectly good person the way i am and eye shadow is not going to change that.

this duo is a combination of a dusty, pinkish-mauve shade and an intense, dark eggplant purple. much like "prism", "exhibition" has awesome power. it's necessary to use a light hand or else you can end up overdoing things pretty easily. even if you want things fairly intense, i'd recommend building the colour in layers, rather than just caking it on. applying hourglass shadows too thickly is about the only way you can get them to crease. exercise a little caution and you can expect a full day of looking perfect. or more perfect than you usually do. [can i also recommend not jabbing yourself in the eye with the makeup brush while applying, the way that i did? because not jabbing yourself in the eye is wicked.]




as far as i can tell from using and from swatching colours on my hand, all hourglass shadows are incredibly smooth and blend together easily to create a seamless look.

although i do, as mentioned, have a vast stable of beautiful purples at my disposal, these shades were both pretty distinct. the darker shade is somewhat more dupe-able, only because it's harder to pick up the nuances of colour in use. but that said, it still looked different from any of the dark purples i already had. honestly, it looks almost black from some angles, but the red-purple shimmer catches the light at others, like seeing reflections of minerals inside a stone.

the lighter shade of the duo is a bit of a strange bird. although clearly a purple shade on its own, it's neutral enough that it looks brown next to cooler purple shades. mac's "shale" is a fairly close cousin, but is quite a bit darker and browner still. "illegal cargo"- the limited edition mac shade from a few years back, not the one that was released with last year's holiday collection- is a cooler, more lilac shade, although it has a similar neutral-grey undertone. chanel's "fauve", which i would have thought would be similar, is much darker, greyer and has a silver sparkle.

l to r :: mac shale, hourglass exhibition light, mac illegal cargo [l.e.], chanel fauve

the darker shade, as i said, has closer analogues. mac's "beauty marked" is most similar, although the finishes between the two are quite different. "beauty marked" is a black shadow with fine red-purple glitter sitting in it. "exhibition" is one smooth, shimmery shade. armani "lust red" is, appropriately enough, redder and the fact that it is a lot more reflective makes it look lighter as well. mac's "unflappable" is cooler and greyer.

l to r :: mac beauty marked, hourglass exhibition dark, armani lust red, mac unflappable [l.e.]

combined, these two are great for a stunning take on a smoky eye that's a bit different than the usual black/ grey combination [for that, "prism" is perfect]. for a lighter look, you can stick to having the lighter colour dominate, while the dark shade can be used as a liner or to deepen the outer corner. one of the reasons that these little duos work so well is that they move effortlessly from day to night time wear, even if you don't have the time to run home and refurbish yourself completely. they come with a small but fairly useful brush and a compact with a mirror that swivels. the closure is magnetic and strong enough that it can withstand being carried in a makeup bag or having a muscular tonkinese cat stand on it. [i have to admit, i get a kick out of stacking my hourglass duos one on top of the other and seeing how they stick together. i'm easily amused.]

here's a look at "exhibition" in action. i couldn't decide whether i liked it more used lightly or really smoked out, but i guess the nice thing is that i don't have to choose.













for both of these, i'm using my usual mac prolongwear foundation "nc15" and dr. hauschka concealer, shade "01". [i'll be reviewing that one soon.]


exhibition by day


eyes ::
hourglass visionaire e/s duo "exhibition" [soft mauve/ dark eggplant]
mac e/s "creamy bisque"* [pinkish ivory highlight]
chanel inimitable intense mascara

cheeks ::

mac beauty powder "briar rose"* [wild rose pink]

mac mineralize skinfinish "lightscapade"* [pearly highlight]

lips ::
mac l/s "radicchio"* [cool mauve-plum]

*suggested alternates :: creamy bisque = mac dazzlelight; briar rose = nars mata hari [brighter, redder]; lightscapade = guerlain meteorites teint rose; radicchio = mac plumful [sheerer, pinker], or you could try using "dish it up" which is limited but still available- see a comparison here.

exhibition by night

eyes ::
hourglass visionaire e/s duo "exhibition"
mac mega-metal e/s "prance"* [shimmery silver-mauve]
benefit they're real mascara

cheeks ::
edward bess quad royale "south of france" [sandy mauve]

lips ::
armani gloss d'armani "603" [sheer raisin]

*suggested alternates :: prance = mac crystal [cooler, less shimmery]; in retrospect, though, i found that "prance" made things look too heavy and shimmery. i'd probably go with a very neutral matte highlight [inglot has tons] or just not bother. the pigmentation of the hourglass duo is intense enough and doesn't need a lot else added to it.

and in case you're wondering, yes, that is a cat scratch on my nose. thanks, simon.

hourglass products are available from sephora and from zuneta.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

so what the hell happened here?

even i'm shocked at the fact that i haven't written a blog post in a month and a half. and i'm confused by it, which many of you may not be because, hey, blogs are dead, right? well, i don't know if they're dead dead. this place gets a surprising number of daily views considering that there have been no new posts since early february. and if you're one of the regular readers who might have been checking in to see which of my regular subjects i'd be tackling next, i'm going to have to disappoint you: this post is just going to be some meaningless blather.

first of all, i didn't intend to step back from the blog- not for a month and a half, not at all. i figured i'd just keep motoring on much as i had been for the last dozen or so years, if for no other reason than it had become as natural to me as breathing or reading stuff on the internet that made me angry.

so why haven't i written anything here?

it's not because i've lacked subjec…

making faces :: three springs

this post comes with a bit of a preamble:

it's hardly surprising that i would eventually become fascinated by the sci-art theory of personal colour,
given that it's linked both with aesthetics and with psychology. i'm actually a little surprised that it took me this long, but i have been making up for lost time by reading through a lot of the posts on the fascinating 12 blueprints blog, after having gotten a taste for the subject from reading everyday beauty's adventures in being drapes.

for those not familiar with the concept, i do not claim to be an expert, but it basically stems from theories of how we perceive colours. for someone who has long been schooled in the concepts that there are certain colours that everyone perceives as "strong" or "relaxing" or "energetic", etc., it's a bit of a process of unlearning. or at least, learning that what you might have accepted as gospel before was somewhat limited.

it's certainly been il…

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…