Skip to main content

making faces :: little red book, part 10

can you guess the last red?
yes, readers, we've finally arrived at the end of the book of seasonal reds. i wasn't really sure how to wind things up, because, as i mentioned, there are still lots of great reds i could share... but in the interests of having this end some time before next christmas, i've chosen to stop here.

i'd originally wanted to show the greatest variety in brands possible by not repeating any, but then i realised that i couldn't very well limit myself to just one chanel red [believe me, i could do a series just on those] and i wanted to call attention to my favourites. that said, there are some brands which inevitably got left out. sorry guys. another time, i promise.

way back when i did my "choose your lips" post, about which brand does which colour best, i had said that the runner up for reds was mac, not because of their regular red shades, but because they do so many great limited edition red shades. now that i've had more opportunity to explore, i think that second prize for reds should actually go to yves st. laurent, who just keep improving their range of available shades and finishes. but mac are still a strong contender [as is makeup forever, although their finishes are more limited], as long as you don't get too frustrated that their best reds are limited edition.

i know that many people go gaga for mac's standard reds, particularly cardinal "russian red" and blue-toned "ruby woo". i like those colours, although i don't think that they're especially unique and i just find the formula too heavy and [especially on the latter] too drying. for whatever reason, mac seem to save their best efforts for shades that are only around for a couple of months [if you're lucky], which just goes to prove what i've suspected for a while: mac cosmetics' product development department is staffed completely by sadists.

but i can get with that, which is why, for my last red, i've chosen a limited shade from 2008 that can be tricky to find. that's not to say that you can't find it- i did- but you really have to want it. you have to be willing to offer some sacrifices to the aesthete gods and do everything they tell you. and, of course, you have to look. the aesthete gods don't do your work for you.

my choice was also partly guided by dom, who was surprised i hadn't done a darker red shade yet. of course, it's not like i haven't done dark, dramatic lips before in looks that i've posted, but he does have a point in that darker reds are some of my very favourites. so i went with something a little deeper, without being full-on vampy. [if that's what you're looking for, i did list a few of my very favourite vampy lipsticks here and, who knows, i might do that as my next series. god knows i have enough dark lipsticks.]

so here it is...




so scarlet.

this was released with mac's "cult of cherry" collection, which, i keep mentioning, was my favourite mac collection of all time. this lipstick just sums up everything that i loved about the collection as a whole. it's deep and rich and saturated and glossy and alluring and... well, it's a damn fine red.

it's certainly a darker shade, but it's also very elegant, the kind of thing you could wear to a cocktail party or a business meeting. i like the fact that, unlike a lot of darker red shades, it doesn't veer into purple-berry territory or into brown-ground. it stays a gorgeous dark cherry red and, while it pulls a little cool, i think that women with golden or olive undertones could wear it just as easily as those of us with rosier cheeks. [meaning my skin is naturally a little pink, not that i have gin blossoms. i swear.]

like most strong shades, it requires little in the way of adornment and i had an idea of combining it with other dark or muted takes on primary colours, so that i used tones of yellow, blue and, of course, red. i don't think that the "primary-ness" stands out in the look at all, at least not in a wonder woman kind of way, but it is there. oh, and speaking of wonder woman, that is one of the blushes from her mac collection released earlier this year. in fact, almost this whole look is a selection of "shit from mac you can't get anymore", but that doesn't mean you can't hunt it down.

here's what i used. [as usual, i've suggested alternates for limited products at the bottom. doesn't mean they're duplicates, but they are available.]

face ::
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"

eyes ::
mac e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery highlight]
mac e/s "ochre style"* [deep ochre yellow]
urban decay "buck" [warm medium brown]
mac fluidline "siahi"* [dark teal]
makeup forever concealer pencil "light"

cheeks ::
mac blush "mighty aphrodite"* [bright peachy coral]

lips ::
mac l/s "so scarlet"* [dark cherry red]

*suggested alternates :: ochre style = mac double feature 4 shadow duo [ochre shade]; siahi = hard to match, i'd advise combining a teal and black liner to get the same effect; mighty aphrodite = benefit bella bamba [pinker and with more shimmer]; so scarlet = mac media [considerably darker, but might work if blotted]

i hope you've found some reds to inspire and thrill you. i'll post a recap shortly for those who might want to see everything at once.

oh and while i was out christmas shopping yesterday, i bought myself a little present... a brand new red lipstick.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…