Skip to main content

making faces :: lusting after guerlain's gorgeous gardner

the look of love...
dear guerlain,

did something go awry with your logistics department? in the fall, you released this delicious deep berry lipstick called "gigolo", which might have been perfect for the season, but which also seems very holiday-appropriate. now i find out that you're releasing "gardner", a rich, warm red with a sumptuous, although subtle amber-gold shimmer drizzled through it like a touch of honey and i can't help thinking that it seems less in keeping with traditional ideas of holiday reds than your fall choice. was a mistake made? or are you simply playfully challenging the notions of seasonal shades? not that i care, because i love your rouge g lipsticks and as long as i think i can get away with the colour, i'm going to buy them and where them in whatever season i damn well please [because at that price, i'm getting my money's worth].
i have to say that "gardner" is a real winner. it has the creamy texture i've come to expect, the even coverage, the uniqueness that makes me fork over hard-earned money and optimum points to get them. although i didn't find this shade lasted quite as long on my lips as "gigolo", i'm not going to fault you for that, because that one was sort of exceptional. it stood up very well for several hours and, although the satiny sheen of first application faded [as it must], the colour retained its distinctive characteristics rather than becoming an ordinary orange-red stain.

about the shade's distinctiveness, i have to admit that it not only excites me as i try to come up with words to describe a shade i truly didn't have in my collection but thinking about it makes me hungry. i believe that's because the shade puts me in mind of autmnal foods- deep, vibrant roasted red peppers, smoky paprika, sundried tomatoes- i'm reminded of these far more than i am of other lipstick shades. i truly don't know how you do it, meaning come up with things that are just so difficult to match. and it's not that i don't have a lot of things to try matching it to. i thought that maybe your own shade "gipsy" was similar, but it's lighter and it's much more of a pumpkin orange with gold shimmer. lovely, but not at all the same. everything else seemed either much too brown [and there's really very little brown in "gardner" at all] or much too red.

MORE OF THIS LOVE LETTER AND MORE PICS AFTER THE BREAK



when i saw that both you and nars opted for a holiday palette featuring blues for the eyes and amber-tones for the lips, i was afraid they'd end up looking exactly the same, but that's not at all the case. while i might have given the edge to nars on the eyes, their holiday lipstick "joyous red" is much lighter and, ironically, less red than "gardner".

it's a little surprising to me just how much i love this shade, because i tend to favour cooler reds, but occasionally i just meet a warmed-up shade like this and i realise that life is too short to impose arbitrary limits on one's colour palette. 

although my bank account would like to beg you to stop with the wonderful colours, i know that i will never tire of seeing them or wearing them and every time i whip out one of your elborate rouge g cases, my lips and i feel sinfully spoiled. i am certain you will continue to confound and amaze me with each passing season, even if you introduce a black rouge g with your spring 2012 collection.

yours with love and beautifully coloured kisses,
kate

p.s. a few of my friends have suggested that i'd make a great lip model for guerlain. i'm game if you are.

p.p.s. i've heard that gardner is only available in europe, but we have it here in canada. i do notice that it's not available on sephora or neiman marcus or nordstrom and, most shocking, there's no mention of it on your web site. if it's true that this colour is only available in limited countries [you know, chanel usually lumps canada in with europe too, which is odd, but i'll take it] that's quite naughty of you, guerlain! because now i have to tell my american readers that if they want this, they'll have to find someone in europe or canada willing to get it for them. [excuse me while i cackle sadistically at the thought of all the things that the u.s. gets that i never even see.]

p.p.p.s. below are a few photos of a look i did for my first date with "gardner". we went for a walk. it was lovely.

"gardner"

the lips are naturally going to be the focus with a rich colour like that, but since it's not an overly dark colour, i was trying to use slightly warmer tones. strangely, i find that the camera didn't pick up the green around my eyes at all, although i assure, it was there. i do think that these photos are a really accurate representation of what "gardner" looks like. so, yes, this is what you're in for.

products used

face ::
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"

eyes ::
mac e/s "motif" [peachy gold with pink iridescence]
mac e/s "dazzlelight" [light neutral highlighter]
nars e/s "night porter" [blackened pine green]
chanel e/s "khaki vert" [frosted olive green with gold]
mac greasepaint stick "greengrease"* [greenish black]
mac superslick liquid liner "desires & devides" [dirty khaki green]
benefit they're real mascara

cheeks ::
mac highlight powder "marine life"* [pink-coral]

lips ::
guerlain rouge g l/s "gardner" [deep, warm red]

*suggested alternates :: greengrease = makeup forever aqua eyes pencil "20l"; marine life = nars deep throat

Comments

I LOVE it sooo much!!! PS..You have such flawless skin!
flora_mundi said…
This shade would be just devastating on you, for certain.

And thanks for the skin compliment. It's honestly dumb luck, because I've only started taking care of it properly in the last few years.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

dj kali & mr. dna @ casa del popolo post-punk night

last night was a blast! a big thank you to dj tyg for letting us guest star on her monthly night, because we had a great time. my set was a little more reminiscent of the sets that i used to do at katacombes [i.e., less prone to strange meanderings than what you normally hear at the caustic lounge]. i actually invited someone to the night with the promise "don't worry, it'll be normal". which also gives you an idea of what to expect at the caustic lounge. behold my marketing genius.

mr. dna started off putting the "punk" into the night [which i think technically means i was responsible for the post, which doesn't sound quite so exciting]. i'd say that he definitely had the edge in the bouncy energy department.

many thanks to those who stopped in throughout the night to share in the tunes, the booze and the remarkably tasty nachos and a special thank you to the ska boss who stuck it out until the end of the night and gave our weary bones a ride home…

white trash

yes, my lovelies, i have returned from the dead, at least for the time it takes me to write this post. this is not just another piece of observational drivel about how i haven't been taking care of the blog lately, although i clearly haven't. on that front, though, the principal cause of my absence has actually been due to me trying to get another, somewhat related project, off the ground. unfortunately, that project has met with some frustrating delays which means that anyone who follows this blog [perhaps there are still a few of you who haven't entirely given up] would understandably be left with the impression that i'd simply forsaken more like space to marvel at the complexity of my own belly button lint. [it's possible you had that impression even before i disappeared.]

ok, enough with that. i have a subject i wanted to discuss with you, in the sense that i will want and encourage you to respond with questions, concerns and criticism in the comments or by em…

drive-by musings

i've written a fair bit on this blog about being a writer who waits for inspiration to strike her out of nowhere versus being a writer who puts serious work in on a daily basis and in doing so cultivates those precious lightning strikes and bottles them. i believe in and strongly encourage people to employ the latter method, as does pretty much every writer [or creative person] who is successful at this sort of thing. there have been stretches where i've been very good at this but the fact is that i slack off a lot and my brain has a tendency to grasp at multiple ideas at once without being able to relinquish any of them. basically, my brain is like someone who hasn't eaten in three days arriving at a buffet. everything looks good but the end result is that you end up with a bizarre combination of all of it that isn't nearly as satisfying as sticking to one flavour palette. [don't you dare tell me that cheese sticks go with sushi, because i will end you.]

i've…