Skip to main content

making faces :: little red book, part 5


get your drag-on
picture the ultimate, glamourous, screen-siren red lips you can imagine. what you're thinking of is probably chanel's rouge allure laque in "dragon". part of a line of liquid lipsticks- meaning they apply like a glossy [with a lacquer-shiny finish] and set as a full-coverage lipstick- "dragon" is a cult favourite red far and wide, including with me. i think that chanel hit all the right notes with this one and as soon as i got my greedy little paws on it, it quickly became my ultimate red.

the colour is extremely wearable, since it pulls neither warm nor cool. it's aptly named, in that it does remind me of a typical "chinese red", the colour of new year's dragons, or pottery or the lanterns that festoon chinatown restaurants and shops. it's a bold colour without being eye-poppingly bright, dramatic but very classy.

the formula is very nice as well. it stays quite moisturising, even after it's set and although it does tend to feather a little around the edges, that's easily controlled with a liner. [in fact, i find the feathering faint enough that i can usually just smooth it away with my finger.] it's pretty idiot-proof to apply [and trust me, that means something coming from me] and it lasts for hours, requiring only minor touch-ups after eating or drinking.

and now the bad news.



chanel has apparently decided to discontinue the entire rouge allure laque line, with the possible exception of one colour. and that colour isn't "dragon". so while it's currently available wherever chanel is sold, it won't be replenished once it runs out. so your opportunity to buy the world's most perfect red lipstick is running short. let us take a moment to mourn.

i find that this is the sort of shade that demands to be the star, so i like to keep everything around it fairly neutral. it's also a great choice for a "big night out", since it really does have star power all on its own. the last time i wore it out, i opted to go with complementary makeup that was very neutral, but with lots of shimmer [since "dragon" has a creamy finish with no visible shimmer, i figured it would make a nice counterpoint]. i think that this is a definite soiree-friendly look, dressy and classic but fun. it's not something i'd necessarily recommend for a venue that's brightly lit.

must be seen in person
i'd also like to take this opportunity to talk about one of the eye shadows that chanel has released with their holiday collection, "beige lamé". i'm normally quick to dismiss anything that dares call itself beige, but in this case, that would be a huge mistake. while it does have a warm beige base [deeper than my skin tone by a few shades], it is replete with soft pink and teal shimmer, which, for once, is quite visible on application [although difficult to capture in photographs]. the effect is really quite breathtaking, because the colour is neutral, but with incredible dimension. i also find that the sparkly quality really brightens my eyes when i wear it. it's limited edition, so it might be a good idea to grab that when you're out hunting the endangered "dragon".

i went for even a little more sparkle by using nars' "new order" blush on my cheeks and decolleté, just for extra "oomph". because a girl needs her oomph. [see my original review here.]

of course, since i did this look for a night out, i had to use a flash for the photographs, which always annoys me. i don't find that the colours show up as true to life as i want them and there's a sort of gold haze cast over everything. so the photos are a little warmer in tone than in real life, but hopefully you get the idea.

here's what i used:

face ::
gosh foundation primer
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"

eyes ::
chanel e/s "beige lamé" [sparkly warm beige]
mac e/s "mulled cider"* [warm medium brown]
mac greasepaint stick "french quarter"* [dark golden brown]
mac e/s "creamy bisque"* [soft white]
benefit they're real mascara

cheeks ::
mac magically cool liquid powder "truth & light" [peachy highlighter]
nars blush "new order" [sparkly light pink]
mac blush "darkly my dear"* [ruddy plum]

lips ::
chanel rouge allure laque "dragon" [cardinal red]

*suggested alternates :: mulled cider = mac "swiss chocolate"; french quarter = makeup forever aqua eyes 4l; creamy bisque = mac "dazzlelight"; darkly my dear = mac "blushbaby" [lighter, pinker]

Comments

littlepickle said…
Dragon looks amazing on you, Kate! Unfortunately it just didn't work for me, so I sold it :( it pulled a tad dark and feathered badly, even with lipliner. I adore the colour & wish I could have made it work!
flora_mundi said…
Aw... Sorry to hear it didn't work. I guess there really is no thing as a perfect, universal red. Hope you've found one that's perfect for you, though!

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …