Skip to main content

making faces :: little red book, part 4

it's no secret that dom and i are big halloween fans, so it shouhld come as no surprise that dom won his office halloween costume contest this year, by going in as someone who had had a lobotomy. [pro tip: mac's "nightmoth" lip pencil apparently makes for an a-1 lobotomy scar.] the prize was two tickets to see a cfl playoff game with our hometown montreal alouettes that took place last sunday. dom is an als fan and i used to go to college games with my father, who used to write about them for local papers, so while neither of us comes close to what you'd think of as a "sports fan", we both know enough to make the experience enjoyable.

the problem with this was that it required me to be somewhere before noon on a sunday. i'm never a fast-moving animal in the morning. i seem to have retained the part of my ancient lizard brain that requires a long warm-up period before getting into action when i first awake and on the weekends, this becomes even more pronounced. i don't like to be rushed at the best of times and pushing me to move quickly on a november morning before i've had coffee is flat-out dangerous, which is probably why dom chose to remind me very quietly of the time as i was rising from the depths.

in order to make sure that we were on time and that i didn't feel rushed, i gave myself a challenge: i'd come up with a new entry for this series [meaning that it had to be something i felt comfortable posting on the internet] and i wasn't allowed to take more than five minutes to do my makeup. challenge accepted.

SEE THE RESULTS AFTER THE BREAK...



i think that one of the things that puts women off wearing makeup when they might want to is the added time it would mean to their morning routines. the fact is that a lot of us have ourselves timed pretty tightly, so that we can get maximum sleep and still arrive at our jobs on time and reasonably presentable. also, a lot of women just don't enjoy fussing around with their face so much in the mornings. and of course, it helps to have some tricks in your arsenal that will allow you to compensate for those times when you overslept, or spent too long drinking your coffee, or are just running late for any number of reasons. the rules i live by when i'm in a hurry are:

1. applying things with your fingers or with large brushes is easy and fast. anything that requires a more detailed touch- putting colour in the crease of your eyelid, blending shades- is going to take time. cream shadows and blushes [some of which can double as lip colours] are your friends. just remember to wipe your fingers off between products.

2. bold, simple colours look good on their own.

3. eye liner is the enemy. in a rush, you can swipe something along your water line, but lining your upper lash line is something you want to avoid. it will take time you don't have and chances are, it won't go the way you want it to.

so for this day, i chose to wear "gesina", a mac cosmetics colour from their 2010 "couture collection" [done in collaboration with designer marcel wanders]. it's a bright, punchy pinky-red with a semi-glossy finish [that becomes less apparent over time]. because it's opaque in a single pass and has lovely, even coverage, it's a perfect selection when you're in a hurry. it also lasts for hours, which is nice when you don't want to be fussing with your face during the day.

gesina, freshly applied
gesina after drinks, a snack, a clothing change and 8hrs of wear


unfortunately, gesina was a limited edition colour and isn't available any longer from mac, but you can still find it sometimes on ebay and through online cosmetic clearance houses. about the closest thing currently available is chanel's newly launched "la fascinante", which is decidedly more muted, pinker and has a more matte finish.

having decided on a nice red lip. everything else was kept super-simple. with a shade like "gesina" you don't want to have anything else compete for attention. i used a cream shadow, one of mac's paint pots with just a few pats of a slightly darker powder shadow on the outer corners to give some dimension. i did choose to use a liner on my water line, something to brighten my dull, caffeine-deprived eyes. a couple of sweeps of bronzing blush [helps me look alive, even when i'm not] and voilĂ : a full face in five minutes.

here are the details of what i used:

face ::
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15" [save time, eschew concealer unless absolutely necessary]

eyes ::
mac paint pot "vintage selection"* [warm peachy nude with shimmer]
mac e/s "patina" [gilded taupe- a shade that pretty much everyone should have. it's incredibly versatile, universally flattering and surprisingly difficult to duplicate]
mac eye kohl "i get no kick"* [champagne nude]
benefit they're real mascara

cheeks ::
guerlain terra inca radiant powder* [shimmering light pink-bronze]

lips ::
mac l/s "gesina"* [bold pinkish red]

*suggested alternates :: vintage selection = benefit creaseless cream "r.s.v.p."; i get no kick = nars larger than life eye liner "rue bonaparte"; terra inca = mac mineralize skinfinish "gold deposit" [not a great match as it's darker and warmer, much more of a true bronzer. sorry.]; gesina = chanel rouge allure velvet "la fascinante" [softer, pinker, matte]

and here's an image of us enjoying dom's prize tickets. unfortunately, we were not a good luck charm and montreal lost in overtime.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…