Skip to main content

making faces :: friends with benefit

other than mac, benefit cosmetics was one of the first companies to really pique my interest in the beauty industry. their irreverent modern-day glamour girl imagery and innovative products were right up my alley and i would always eagerly try out their newest releases because it was nice to think that someone else noticed that cosmetics should be fun. i also really appreciate the fact that when i was contacting beauty companies to find out their policies on animal testing, benefit's customer service sent me back a thoughtful, detailed response. [they're fur-baby friendly.]

unfortunately, over the years, my benefit experiences have been problematic. i absolutely loved their "high beam" highlighting liquid, which gives a white-pink radiance to skin, but on me, i found that it emphasised my pores unless i applied it in very specific areas, buffed it out, worked some foundation around it... basically spent way too much time for any cosmetic product. [i'm a firm believer that if you have to fidget a lot with a beauty to make it work, it's not worth the bother.]

i initially fell in love with their pore-refining, skin-smoothing beauty balm "dr. feelgood", which had enough of an effect on my skin that i could wear it instead of foundation, but it started to clog my pores and give me breakouts in short order. i've mostly avoided their new skin care line out of fears of the same reaction- it's very heavily perfumed and [aside from the fact that i dislike the artificial scent] that's almost always a huge no-no for me.

i've heard wonderful things about their concealing products, but virtually all of them are too dark to work on me. 

although i always felt that colour cosmetics were a bit of a weak spot for the brand, i gave their lipsticks a try earlier this year, because i found a shade that was a perfect cool my-lips-but-better pink, something i'd not found anywhere else. my feelings were mixed, but i will say that i've grown fonder of the colour and more forgiving of the issues with the formula in the months since i've written that review. and i find that the issues i had with their cult favourite "creaseless cream" shadows are considerably lessened in cooler weather. [and i'll repeat- i am not a cream shadow girl. aside from mac's paint pots, the creaseless creams are pretty much the only ones that don't make me want to cut my eyelids off.]

the two areas in which i feel that benefit has always excelled are in those neglected areas of the beauty regimen, mascara and blush. they're "bad gal" mascara was the only one i wore for years and i have to say that most mascaras from prestige brands don't measure up to it. and i've always loved their shimmery little boxes of blush in an surprisingly universal shades. so i'm always going to be pretty open to trying their new entrants in this market.



i had planned to buy another tube of "bad gal" when i got sucked into trying the cheekily-named "they're real!", the brand new mascara benefit launched this summer. since i'd been using the over-hyped diorshow mascara previously, i felt that even a lesser benefit product would likely be an improvement. and it is.

real enough
at first, i had a little bit of trepidation, because the extraordinarily hard plastic brush had a tendency to clump my lashes together and make them appear spiky. however, as i've used the product on a daily basis, this tendency has disappeared and now it just gives me a nice black fringe with excellent separation. the mascara is better for defining and lengthening than giving volume ["bad gal" gives both, but is probably better for volume, if you want a point of differentiation- you can also look here]. where "they're real" stood out to me, though, was in the curl i noticed. now, my lashes are already pretty curled, so it's not something i've ever looked for, because i don't want to accidentally flip them so that they're pointed towards my eyeballs. however, if it's curl you want, this is the best formula i've ever found.

although it's not as dark as "bad gal", i still found it deeper than a lot of other mascaras on the market. and i really like the fact that it doesn't get crusty/ flaky after a few hours wear. it maintains very well, to the point where it's proved a wee bit challenging to remove at the end of the day, but given the choice between a mascara that checks out by mid-afternoon and a few extra minutes of washing my face, i'll take the latter.

my other cheek, let me show you it
at the same time, i tried out a new shade [for me] of benefit blush, the "3-d effect" blush that supposedly sculpts and defines features. i can't say i noticed my face being any more 3-d than usual, but this is a gorgeous, fruity coral-pink shade with a lovely shimmer that makes cheeks glow like you just received the greatest compliment of your life. it has plenty of colour payoff, so it would show up on darker complexions, but it works fine on pale ladies too, as long as you're careful to use a light hand.

so here's the details on a look i did to take my new benefit goodies out on the town. it's a sort of a subtle autumnal look, more appropriate for daytime wear than a full-on vampy lip or smoky eye, certainly more appropriate for a stuffy office atmosphere. and sometimes, i just like to try out a look that isn't dramatic, just for laughs.

products used

face ::
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates"

eyes ::
mac e/s "creamy bisque"* [soft white]
mac e/s "nanogold"* [sheer, sparkly light peach-pink]
mac e/s "mythical"* [pinkish copper]
mac mineralize e/s "smoked ruby"* [burgundy brown]
mac superslick liquid liner "on the hunt" [black]
benefit they're real mascara

cheeks ::
benefit 3-d powder "bella bamba" [shimmery coral-pink]

lips ::
bobbi brown l/s "black raspberry" [semi-opaque dark red]

*suggested alternates :: creamy bisque = mac dazzlelight; nanogold = mac pink frontier; mythical = mac amber lights [more copper] or expensive pink [more pink]; smoked ruby = nars galapagos [darker, much less red]

Comments

Biba said…
I got the the sample size of Bella Bamba the other day and I just love the colour too.
flora_mundi said…
It's great and I really do believe it is that elusive thing- a blush that works on almost every skin tone.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…