Skip to main content

making faces :: sunday silliness [face of the day]

over the weather, under the weather
i'm the first person to admit that, if i don't have anything particularly pressing, or if for some reason i haven't been able to have coffee, i don't bother making myself look all spiffy. on the other hand, days when you're pretty much free to do what you want can also be great for trying things out that you wouldn't normally, particularly if circumstances force you into situations where you have to be cautious about the impression you're making on others.

such days also offer me the opportunity to go through my cosmetics list [yes, i keep a list, because as the collection gets bigger and the memory gets dodgier, i'm lucky if i can remember which part of the face gets the shadow and which the gloss] and find things that i haven't pulled out in a while.

since this weekend's freakishly warm weather has seemed less like thanksgiving and more like "thank god it's summer", i figured i'd try out something appropriately bright and summery-looking as well. [yes, as much as i love the deep, sultry colours of fall, sometimes you have to punch it up a little.]

SEE THE RESULTS [AND SILLINESS]...



i decided to pull out mac's "cobalt" eye shadow and one of their "superglass" lip glosses, neither of which has seen much love recently. "cobalt" is a matte and has a reputation for being one dry and stiff- decent qualities in a man, but generally undesirable in makeup. i don't actually find that it's all that bad. to me, the biggest problem with it is that it tends to sheer out quite easily, so getting a nice, intense shade like it appears in the pan, can be an exercise in frustration. it's similar to "atlantic blue", which is also a permanent product, and to "royale" which was just released with the "fall colour collection". i'm given to understand that the colour payoff on the latter is better than on the first two... if you need an excuse to go shopping.

the "superglass" formula was something that mac introduced last year in a limited edition. based on reactions i heard, i'd expect them to be brought back sometime between the pigs flying and the snowstorm in hell. unlike a lot of people, i liked them. they compare to mac's sparkly "dazzleglass" glosses, but they're thicker [meaning they last longer and don't move around as much] without being overly sticky. plus, they're even more dazzling because they're infused with a lot more glittery bits that reflect the light. personally, i don't find that i can see the glitter unless i'm really looking myself directly in the lips [which is kind of difficult to do, either for me or for anyone else], so it's more like looking at the sun sparkling on a pond. and who wouldn't want pond lips?

here's what i used:

face ::
mac matchmaster foundation "1" [i've been trying this out and am pretty impressed]
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"

eyes ::
mac e/s "vanilla" - slightly peachy light neutral
mac e/s "sweet & punchy"*- chartreuse
mac e/s "humid"- pine green
mac e/s "blue absinthe"* - darkened teal
mac e/s "cobalt"- bright iris blue
mac superslick liquid liner "on the hunt"- black
stila sparkle liquid liner "curacao"- shimmery bright blue
mac powerpoint eye liner "undercurrent" - teal
diorshow mascara

shades marked * are limited edition, but there are substitutes available, of course. because the stila liner wasn't as dark as i wanted on its own, i layered the black liner under it. the eyelid is basically a gradient moving from the chartreuse to the green to the teal, with "cobalt" in the crease. "vanilla" is used as a highlighter and blended with the colours below to soften them a bit.

cheeks ::
mac mineralize skinfinish "redhead" - shimmery gold-salmon

lips ::
mac lip liner "dervish"- muted pink
mac superglass l/g "disco blend"- warm peach

and of course, what's the point of getting all dolled up if you can't horse around with a couple of your favourite guys and a digital camera?[and yes, dom is spending this holiday weekend sick as a particularly nauseous dog with a bad cough. but he was still a good enough sport to come and play photo op with me and simon [who loves playing photo op more than just about anything].







Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …