Skip to main content

making faces :: fall on my face

i realise that the mac "fall colour collection" is old hat, but i did sneak back and grab one extra product i hadn't mentioned the first time i did my review, "emerald dusk" pigment. i'm a huge fan of mac's loose pigments, because, despite the fact that they can be a little more finicky to apply [being a loose powder] they give incredible colour payoff and are a dream to blend. once you get the hang of it, it's very easy. i'll offer two hints that will make things way easier:

i squeal for teal. among other things.
1. if you're worried about fallout [dusty powdery bits getting where they're not supposed to], dampen your makeup brush with either a fixing spray [mac's fix+ is excellent] or plain ol' water.

2. never, ever, under any circumstances, mix pets and pigments. don't leave an open pigment unattended if you have pets. don't assume you can play with your pets while you're applying loose pigments, don't even encourage your pets to hang around and watch you, because pigment vials look a lot like toys. shiny, sparkly toys that explode when you play with them and cause all sorts of excitement.

once you have those rules down, everything else is pretty easy.

SEE IT PUT TO USE PLUS ANOTHER "FALL COLOUR" FAVOURITE!




the other argument in favour of loose shadows is that you generally get a lot more colourful bang for your buck. you need very little, but you generally get a lot. they last forever, so you don't have to worry about them going off. oh, and while i'm extolling their virtues, i also find that the nuances of individual shades are more noticeable in loose pigments than pressed shadows.

"emerald dusk" is a fascinating darkened teal shade that shifts in the light from green to blue and has a very silvery sheen. its depth is quite difficult to photograph and how it appears at any given time has more to do with how bright it is and what colours are surrounding it. although i was initially unsure of what to use it with, it's just such a lovely shade that i had to add it to my collection.

i decided to try it with silvery, frosty colours, with the idea that everything would sort of glimmer nicely in the light. in point of fact, i think i was actually wearing this when i shot a lot of "a sense of longing [oblivious]", so most of the people who saw it were either dead or worried because they thought i was stalking them. but i was stalking them with outstanding eye makeup, which is way better than being stalked by someone who looks like the greasy guy from high school who never seemed to take anything but remedial math and metal shop.

here's what i did ::

face ::
mac prolongwear foundation "nc15"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"

eyes ::
mac paint pot "painterly" [as a base. nothing budges.]
mac e/s "crystal avalanche" [frosty white, as a highlight and in the inner corner]
mac pigment "platinum" [silver foil. literally looks like liquid metal. inner half of the lid]
mac pigment "emerald dusk" [dark teal. outer half of the lid and into the crease]
mac e/s "carbon" [used to darken the outer corner just a little]
mac pearlglide e/l "black swan" [upper lash line]
mac eye kohl "smolder" [lower lash line, since "black swan" isn't supposed to be used there]
diorshow mascara

because pigments are soft, i just had to blend lightly at the centre of the lid to make for a transition from the silver to the teal.

cheeks ::
mac mineralize skinfinish "lightscapade"
lancome glowy ballerine blush "butterflies fever" [very light cool pink]

lips ::
mac l/s "hellraiser" [light sparkly lavender]

"hellraiser} was one of mac's "dazzle finish" lipsticks that came out in a limited edition last year. they're sort of like frost finish lipsticks on serious steroids. darker shades appear a little more shimmery than normal, but the lighter shades reflect light like diamonds. personally, i really liked the formula, because aside from being quite eye catching, it also felt quite soft and didn't have the gritty texture i associate with a lot of frost finishes. i'm guessing not that many people agreed with me, since they were never brought back after last fall.

and, since i had a swatch but not a look to go with "plum bright" lipstick in my original review and since i've fallen under its deep, lush, purpley, plummy, berry-y spell, here's a quick recap of a look using that ::

face ::
mac matchmaster foundation "01"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"

eyes ::
mac paint pot "painterly"
mac e/s "silverwear" [very light silvered lilac]
mac e/s "hold my gaze [light grey-green with gold shimmer]
mac e/s "to the ball" [cool purple-grey]
mac e/s "altered state" [dark shimmery plum]
mac superslick liquid liner "smoky heir" [dark purple]
diorshow mascara

the shadows i used were all from one of mac's holiday palettes released last year. it's actually almost time for this year's sets to come out. the holiday palettes are a bit tricky to work with, because the individual shades are quite small, but they are a way to get acquainted with mac shadows and to find some limited gems, since they tend to be mixes of existing and specially made colours.

cheeks ::
mac mineralize skinfinish "lightscapade"
mac blush ombre "vintage grape"

lips ::
mac l/s "plum bright"

cheers from the painted lady...

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…