Skip to main content

the case for casting

shouldn't we all?
an acquaintance of mine who likes to think that he knows more than anybody about everything chastised me before the last election when i pressured him to get out and vote by saying that it was "nice" that i still persisted in my naive exhortations to vote, despite the fact that democracy was obviously a "failed system".  at the time, i gritted my teeth and hoped that my friendly cuteness had been enough to encourage him to vote anyway, but the fact is that i've spent the last two and a half years kicking myself for what i should have said, what i've said to others when they've made the same sort of comments.

first of all, let's get the big issue out of the way: is there a federal party that represents the way that you think a nation, a community or a society should be run on a long-term scale? if the answer s yes, i trust you've figured out which party that is and i encourage you to vote for them. you're very lucky.

now, let's deal with the rest of us.




many people, myself very much included, have paid enough attention to the political system to have learned what options are out there and to have become severely disillusioned. still more know very little about the political system, but are disillusioned anyway because things seem to be going constantly wrong. i consider myself lucky to have been raised in a home where politics came with milk and cereal in the morning. at least that means i've figured out the ways in which things go wrong. i understand that others are prone to simply shrugging their shoulders and ejaculating a profound "wtf?!?!?"

for those who have become disillusioned, it may seem that there is no political option, that since no party represents our most deeply held values, that there is no purpose to voting because there is no meaningful difference between our political options. and, if you insist on voting only when you agree with the broad social view of a party, or their grand vision of society and community, then chances are there is no point in you voting. but i would submit that if these are your criteria, you're voting for the wrong reasons to begin with.

the fact is that visions of utopia are highly individual and finding a person, let alone an entire political party, whose views accord with yours is a likely impossibility. but if you think that's a reason not to vote, then i think maybe it's time you came in from your village in the clouds. elections are not about ideals. elections are about practical realities and the fact that, like it or not, you are implicated in the activities of your government in the most basic ways imaginable. your ideals are your own and you should fight for them with all your spirit and strength. you aren't going to vote [or not vote] for your ideals on monday. get over it.

whether you vote or not on monday, a new government will be elected and you will feel the effects of that whether you vote or not. when was the last time you bought something? anything at all. a couple of hours ago? yesterday? i'd be surprised if many of you could go further than a few days back without thinking of something that you've purchased. that purchase had tax applied. there was a provincial tax, but also a federal one. in fact, the federal tax would have been less than it was when stephen harper was first elected, because, true [for once] to a promise, his conservative government has lowered the level of the gst. that tax and that change affects you every single time you make a purchase. has the lowering of that tax been beneficial for you personally? do you know what the money you pay [5% on every purchase to the federal government] has funded? the government isn't in the business of collecting money only- that money is supposed to be redirected into things from which we all benefit. are you feeling those benefits?

dontcha wish your vote could save a cute like me? it could
if you're working regularly, take a moment to look at your paycheque. they clearly identify the amount of money going to the federal government. does it strike you that you're giving a lot of your pay to the federal government? what are you getting in return? do you have an opinion on where you'd like that money spent? would you prefer to have that money go into improved highways and road transport? or would you rather see it pushed towards improved public transport and housing? these are not overarching questions of worldview. these are questions of what is to be done with the money that you're handing over whether you like it or not.

well, maybe you think that you shouldn't be paying money to some distant sovereign body, you certainly wouldn't be alone in that view. in fact, there are politicians and at least one major political party who agree that you should be in control of as much of your money as possible and they express that belief by promising [and occasionally delivering] lower taxes.

but the fact remains that you are going to end up handing over some money, if only temporarily, to the government. would you rather they spent your money on education or defense? on health care or domestic energy resources? even if you don't believe that any of the major parties reflect your personal world view, you might have opinions on these issues. if someone gave you a thousand dollars to spend on projects for the public good, where would you spend it? is there are party that would make similar choices? perhaps, if you want your money to mean something, you should consider voting for them.

we all have our ideal views of the world. the fact is that 99% of us will never attain them. but that doesn't mean that we should be disinterested in government. far from it. in fact, it means that we should be all the more critical about who we entrust with our money and what we authorise them to do with it. trust me: we're all going to end up paying whether we vote or not. the question isn't one of world view, the question is one of endorsement on the most basic of issues. don't worry about the grand picture- that is something to be negotiated on an ongoing basis through all strata of society. this election is about basics: do you want your road paved? or do you want to be able to take that money and do with it as you see fit? which would benefit you? which would benefit your community? which is more important to you? these are the questions you should be asking yourself when questioning if and how you'll vote on monday. one thing is for certain: those questions will be answered, whether you speak up or not.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: chanel's velvet realm

who doesn't love velvet? i know when i was younger, i used to, as george costanza longed to, "drape myself in velvet" and although that phase passed with time, i still think that the plush fabric has to be one of the high points of human achievement, up there with interior heating, advanced medicine and vodka. so to me, it's no surprise that one of the most hotly anticipated launches in the cosmetic world is chanel's new "rouge allure velvet" lipstick line, because even the name immediately makes me want to put it on my lips.

on a more concrete level, chanel describes these lipsticks as "luminous matte", which is sort of like the holy grail for lipstick lovers. we all want those intense, come-hither film noir lips, the sort where young men and sunlight are lost and never heard from again, but historically [including during the making of those films], applying a matte lipstick felt sort of like colouring in your lips with an old crayon that had…

eat the pain away?

nearly twenty years ago, an emergency room doctor took a look at the crushing muscle tension i was experiencing [they were clenched enough that a doctor at my regular clinic couldn't get a reflex reaction on my left side and thought i might be having a stroke] and told me she believed that i had fibromyalgia. a couple of weeks later, i went to see a family doctor that a coworker had recommended to me. when i told him what the other doctor had said, he snapped that i was being ridiculous, because, if i'd had fibromyalgia, "i wouldn't be able to move". after i moved to toronto, i got a new family doctor and told her what the other doctors had said. she said that she couldn't be sure, but it was better just to deal with any symptoms i had one at a time. then i came back to montreal and got a new family doctor, who didn't really buy into the whole idea of fibromyalgia and said there was no way to do any definitive test anyway. that doctor passed away, and my …