Skip to main content

friday favourites 04.02.11

welcome to the second edition of friday favourites! ok, i have to admit that there was a lot about this week that i really didn't like. first, it was freezing cold. then there was snow. then, of course, there was the cabin fever that accompanies being trapped in your house by cold and snow. but perhaps i shouldn't complain. my current situation allows me to stay at home, rather than hauling myself out of doors in order to get to an office. and besides, when i think about it, it isn't that difficult to think of things that made the week better.

knowing i'm not the only one :: we've all had things go terribly wrong sending texts. sometimes, that is because we're not looking carefully at what we're sending. other times, it's because our smart phones think they're smarter than we are and they take it upon themselves to correct what we're doing. i once tried to send a text message to my sweetie saying "you are my whole world". unfortunately, i made a typo and sent "you ate my whole world" instead. fortunately, there are a growing number of web sites where we can all share our text message misfortunes. eventually, i think we'll all give up and go back to telex. just you wait and see.

the high arts
being back on camera :: those of you who've been reading my blogs about filming conversion will know that the process of making an entirely independent film was, shall we say, challenging. this week, i got my first chance in a year and a half to be in front of a camera again and was happily reminded that filming can be fun. the end product is still under wraps, but i'm sure it'll end up on you tube eventually. the important thing was, we had a good time. who knew that could happen?

you know it'll make you happy

the great enabler :: most men would rather pierce their scrotum with a rusty nail than accompany a lady while she's window shopping for lady things- clothes, shoes makeup, etc. but somehow, i lucked out. in fact, not only does my significant other like to come along, but he's actually got a phenomenal eye for what suits me. of course, he got the nickname "the great enabler" because he's also very good at helping me justify purchases to myself... sure i don't need another pair of shoes, or another dark lipstick, but isn't the point of life to feel good?




backlash against the crtc :: i can't remember the last time i had any positive thoughts about any decision made or policy set by canada's communications overlord. their work generally falls into two categories: either i could care less and think they're wasting tax money that's needed elsewhere, or i find them contemptibly stupid and myopic. their decision to cave into the wishes of telecommunications giants (notably bell) and greenlight across-the-board caps on internet usage most certainly falls into the latter.

i'm not sure who up there thought this would be a good idea, but one thing seems certain: whoever did made no effort to do any kind of independent research and chose instead to accept the telcos word as gospel. basically, their case is that the only people who need unlimited internet access are porn freaks, online gamers and people doing illegal downloads. who the heck would want to defend that demographic?

of course, the truth is that many, many, many people use the internet for other purposes and limiting that access would make canada a member of the technological third world. people are organising revolutions with these tools and the crtc thinks that the internet has no purpose beyond entertainment. their decision clearly shows that there is a desperate need to replace the existing bureaucrats with people who actually know what's going on with technology, rather than reading about it in the newspaper.

the good news is that a lot of people are getting angry and they're speaking up. your tax dollars hard at work, figuring out ways for large corporations to get more money from you. i'm happy to see that, for once, the people have a potential ally in the federal government. i may not agree with many of stephen harper's policies, but in this case, his government seems to get what the crtc does not: everything has changed.

so what's been making your week? what made you smile?

what i'll be watching this week :: well, as i suspected, i did spend much of the week watching what's been happening in egypt. i think we've all been immersed in the coverage and in doing a crash course in recent egyptian history (because, let's face it, most people's knowledge of the country stops with king tut). i think this will still be the situation to watch this week, but personally, i'll be focusing on the u.s. this is truly the first major incident where we'll see how much things have really changed vis-a-vis their willingness to let other countries handle their own affairs.

plus, of course, i'll be following the shenanigans of the crtc. i'm hopeful that, since this seems to be the one policy issue that all parties in parliament have agreed on since jean chretien left office, their decision will be overturned. if and when that happens, it will open a right can of worms, because the government really isn't supposed to go screwing around with decisions made by an arms length organisation. the fact is that this decision is so unbelievably stupid that the government is pretty much obliged to step in. and once that's done, they can't really step back out without questioning whether the time has come to scrap the crtc as a whole and start over. this will be a long, slow-burning story, but potentially huge.

and for those of you in the montreal area, don't forget i'll be dj'ing tomorrow at kill me now, an old school goth-alternative-industrial-new wave night at cabaret playhouse.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…