Skip to main content

microclimatisation

for years, i've been fascinated by the small. perhaps it's because of my diminutive stature, but i'm convinced that there is as much to be learned from observing tiny, anomalous phenomena as from the great trends of history. after all, everything large is composed of a multitude of smaller parts and, if you really want to understand how the superstructure works, it helps to know something of all its underlying components.

recently, i've even come to notice this about the weather. living in montreal, an island set in a narrow river, with three large hills (we call them mountains) in the centre, real mountains to the north and a large plain to the south, i've become aware that the city is not so much a cohesive meteorological whole as one might be given to think. the neighbourhood of notre-dame-de-grace, located to the west of the hills that we call mountains, is consistently cooler and rainier than areas on the eastern side. by comparison, neighbourhoods in the east, are always a few degrees warmer. the plateau, the flat expanse to the north of the hills/ mountains, is in turn dryer than the areas further east and south (closer to the river), which have not only greater heat, but greater humidity than those areas to the west. so one can talk about the overall weather in montreal, but that is always an aggregate of different areas of the city.

people acknowledge the existence of microclimates whether they realise it or not. commonly, when people live close to a large body of water, they expect that the weather will be cooler and windier close to the shore than further inland. san francisco is renown for its peculiar microclimates, where weather in the city can vary dramatically within a tiny geographical area. but the fact is that all cities with temperate climates exhibit this tendency to some degree. this can be a factor of geography, or can be caused by human intervention. this can apply to neighbourhoods, or even- of interest to landscapers and horticulturalists- within a lawn or garden. wherever there is space, there can be a perceptible difference in climate from one area to another.

so what's the weather like where you are?

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …