Skip to main content

the other 9/11

i've been making my way, with some lengthy breaks, through noam chomsky's latest, "failed states". it's by no means his strongest work, but it does touch on a number of interesting issues, including events surrounding 9/11.

by 9/11, i mean september 11, 1973, when an american-backed coup overthrew chile's salvador allende and replaced him with general augusto pinochet. because we've heard so much about that later 9/11, i thought it would be interesting to share a few facts on the original:

- approximately 3,200 people died according to official figures (which are widely viewed to be understated by as much as half).

- adjusted proportionally to population, that is roughly equivalent to between 50 and 100,000 americans being killed at once.

- there were 30,000 cases of torture in pinochet's chile, according to an official inquiry. (adjusted proportionally to population again, that would be the equivalent of 700,000 americans.)

augusto pinochet remained the darling of both ronald reagan and margaret thatcher throughout his reign of terror, something neither has ever bothered to admit was wrong and a travesty of the ideals they purported to defend.

funny, you never hear about that 9/11 nowadays. i wonder why? no, i don't, really. i know.

Comments

spartacus mills said…
Thankyou for posting this. The original 9/11 is a subject particularly close to my heart. One of my very first blog posts was on the subject.
flora_mundi said…
my absolute pleasure. i went back and read your original blog post and i'm glad to know there are people who are trying to bring some perspective to the world.
Jeff said…
The math in this part confused me:

"- approximately 3,20 people died according to official figures (which are widely viewed to be understated by as much as half).

- adjusted proportionally to population, that is roughly equivalent to between 50 and 100,000 americans being killed at once. "

But, yeah, I've known people who had to get away from that situation in Chile. Do you know anything about a paramilitary religious sect that worked with Pinochet called Colonia Dignidad?

Also, another September 11th was when that guy killed himself flying his light plane into the White House on 9-11-1996. Coincidence or conspiracy? You decide.
flora_mundi said…
*hangs head in embarrassment*

for starters, i obviouslsy made a typo there... the figure should have been 3200, not 320... i've gone back and corrected it, thanks.

basically, the math is that 3200, as a percentage of the chilean population at the time, would have been roughly equivalent to between 50 and 100 thousand americans...
John said…
Try to see Ken Loach's contribution to the film 11'9"01, it deals specifically with this tragically overshadowed (ignored?) part of history.
TPN said…
Thanks for the post.
9/11 - On 11 September 1990, George H.W. Bush delivered his famous "Toward A New World Order" speech.
Jeff said…
My head has humilated itself again. The guy who crashed his plane into the White House did it on September 11, 1994, not 1996 as I stated above.

Here's a link to that:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a091194frankcorder

Also, just in case it needs to be stated, I brought it up as an interesting further coincidence about that date. It was not intended to be a coy reference to the cryptically intriguing harsh aural texture combo.
fade.radius said…
9/11 '73 was also a conflicting time for Northern Egypt, as Israel was circling in to take more territory at the tip of the Red Sea area also resulting in deadly casualty.
It's almost like 9/11 is a f'king apocalyptic jynx number...the glitched code...the file with a virus.
I just hope the in next 9/11 cycle I'm abducted by aliens (or something), this whole history repeating itself (like a bad tecno loop track) is starting to irritate...

Though for the record, as a Chilean, thank you for taking the effort in this post.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: chanel's velvet realm

who doesn't love velvet? i know when i was younger, i used to, as george costanza longed to, "drape myself in velvet" and although that phase passed with time, i still think that the plush fabric has to be one of the high points of human achievement, up there with interior heating, advanced medicine and vodka. so to me, it's no surprise that one of the most hotly anticipated launches in the cosmetic world is chanel's new "rouge allure velvet" lipstick line, because even the name immediately makes me want to put it on my lips.

on a more concrete level, chanel describes these lipsticks as "luminous matte", which is sort of like the holy grail for lipstick lovers. we all want those intense, come-hither film noir lips, the sort where young men and sunlight are lost and never heard from again, but historically [including during the making of those films], applying a matte lipstick felt sort of like colouring in your lips with an old crayon that had…

making faces :: getting cheeky

blush might just be the last thing that a beauty lover comes to appreciate, seeing as it can be a matter of slight degrees that separates one product from another, and it's most difficult to tell from just swatching a product how it's going to look. and it did take me a long time to appreciate that, despite loving my refined pallor and believing that my natural rosy flush was more than enough of a blush for me, blush is my friend. it softens, sculpts, perfects and, although you might not see it at first blush [yuk yuk yuk], it is something that subtly harmonises with the other colours in a look to make it "complete". yes, it's the most tricky thing to pull off when you're wearing something that doesn't mesh with your own undertones. but it's also the thing that can take a face from gloomy to glowing with a swish of the magic wand known as a makeup brush.

highlighters are an even trickier lot, since many of the more brilliant ones have a tendency to e…